Evan Rachel Wood seems to have gone from channeling Hollywood screen goddess Marilyn Monroe to boy(?)toy Marilyn Manson – she was photographed looking super gothy at a movie screening in NYC on Tuesday, according to TMZ. While I’m normally more of the blonde bombshell type and I think she took the pale skin a bit too far, I’m kinda digging the new look! What do you guys think? Are the cute hair and floofy dress fooling me into thinking this is gothic chic? Did she decide to dump the Monroe look after Norma Jeans’ recent post-mortem sex tape scandal, or is Evan just trying to match her boyfriend better? More importantly, why is she a girl named Evan?! Help me figure this out, readers!

Photosource: WireImage.com

Popularity: 14%

You Might Also Like:

4 Responses to “Evan Rachel Wood: Two Marilyns in One!”

  1. I usually like when celebs go brunette, it’s a fun change-up. and her dress was cute but the whole look is a little severe. she needs to not try quite so hard.

  2. I agree, Kim – she’s a little overstyled. Still, the new look is both modern and old Hollywood, and I dig that. Very Katherine McPhee in the hair, too!

  3. I get the feeling she is trying to look like Dita. But I still dig her either way.

  4. i think shes beautiful, the new gothic look is great,but it does seem to me that she is trying to match manson better, but what women doesnt do things to please their men…and plus it just might be who she is now, or maybe its who she has really always been but didnt come out with it, until she was with someone who was comfortable enough to be that way. hollywood puts alot of pressure on these women to be beautiful, blonde skinny blah blah blah, and she was a younger actress, but now as she has gotton older she might have just said, hay screw you im going to be who i want to be. and she does a lovely job at it, what ever the reason is for this sudden change, i think its great. shes beautiful.

Leave a Reply

You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <strong>